When you attract the not-so-welcome attention…

Every time I get an email about something I’ve written or an inquiry from other researchers, I have a moment of surprise that someone is actually paying attention to something I did. Even those small things are rewarding because it demonstrates they have given thought to my words and, beyond that, have taken the time to tell me so. I love when it’s positive since it’s far more motivating to want to write when you’re mad. So, the happy notes do make me very happy. Even the constructive criticism, framed in a professional way, is also appreciated. That’s important and necessary feedback. Besides most of the blog comments from people telling me I’m an idiot and don’t know what I’m talking about, there have been other cases where the attention has not been welcome.

I have not had the best exchanges with the Bigfoot/cryptozoology community. On one particular Bigfoot blog that is unmoderated, I’ve experienced the typical base commentary from a small number of pathetic men behind their keyboards. It was clear they didn’t much care for the opinions of a skeptical woman. A few other Bigfoot types have made similar sexist comments. I’ve also been called a “scoftic” (scoffer+skeptic), of course, with the “unbeliever” label stressed to pre-color my work (or poison the well, if you will), and had my picture included in commentary for added effect. No big deal. I do my stuff. If they don’t like it, if they don’t like my opinion, or if they don’t like that it’s coming from a woman, I do not give a damn. If I whined and made a fuss about every time someone put me down or some dude made what MIGHT be construed as a sexist comment, I’d get nothing constructive done.

Along with the occasional crank emails (which are often VERY amusing) and the Mabus harassment (which was not), there are those out of the ordinary moments that make me pause and wonder about people.

After I had a letter to the editor published in my local paper regarding the asinine “Year of the Bible” resolution passed in my state, I received a card at my home address inviting me to seek Jesus. No harm done but someone took the time to find me which was a little weird.

Just recently, I received a call on my home phone. The person, a man, gave me his name, told me to look him up on Google. Meanwhile, he talked constantly for about 10 minutes, rambling on about various topics of conspiracy. He had found me via a story I had written for Doubtful News. He told me that he had additional information that I would be interested in and told me more. But it made little sense, was delivered in a fairly incoherent (even though he was very articulate) stream of ideas, and, clearly, I wasn’t grasping the point. When I asked what he wanted from me, he went deeper into government conspiracy mode. Then, he revealed he “knew” where I lived and had passed through there frequently. Finally, after nearly 20 minutes I stopped him again to ask just WHAT he wanted me to do about this. That’s when he gave up and said “Nevermind” because it was obvious I “didn’t care”. It’s not that I didn’t care, it was that I don’t have time to listen to run on stories that have no basis in fact. And I didn’t invite you to call my home and tell me about it. Since I do not give my home number out to people, it is invasive to call me at there and assume I’ll be open to talking to you. To suggest you “know” where I live is also threatening and a warped thing to say. How did you think I was going to react?

Soon after, I discovered this guy is a known and rather notorious annoyance to officials and media people for many years now. That actually made me feel better since he’s not been arrested for actually committing a crime. I’m not the only one he bugs, he just does this.

Yesterday, I received a nonthreatening email from someone who has been watching the Virtual Skeptics webcast and has been conducting an unofficial experiment on me. He is attempting to communicate telepathically during the broadcasts. Of course this was unbeknownst to me. According to his conclusions, I have demonstrated that I am “telepathically aware”. Well, gee. That’s nice. Wish I’d known.

The truth is I’m not. I don’t think there is a psychic sense that can transcend physical laws of time and distance and be uninhibited by environmental conditions.

I don’t want to participate in your experiment, thanks. There are professionals who can help you with that.

If you want me to assist you in some way, don’t enlist me into your plans. ASK nicely.

When I send my thoughts, ideas and personal information out there into the internet, I don’t know where it’s going to land. It might hit some fertile mind and grow a new idea. I have no control over what people do with it. That’s scary. Some outspoken people have gotten MUCH worse treatment, I know. But, you must accept that there is some bad that come with the good in order to make a difference.

I can control that exchange to a point. But not entirely.

If your idea prompts someone to make a positive change, that’s ideal. But sometimes, it just rubs someone the wrong way or they see it in ways you never even anticipated. Be prepared.

About these ads

Published by

idoubtit

Http://SharonAHill.com

7 thoughts on “When you attract the not-so-welcome attention…”

  1. Good lord Sharon you attract some cranks don’t you, from the Psycho who sought out your private number, to the Loon who engaged you in his psychic experiments,
    (That tickled me).
    Not to mention the poor under evolved souls who cannot bare to be told anything by a woman. In this the 21st Century, are they still out there?
    I’m new to your doubtit / skeptic writings,
    I love ‘em, facinating, and you right with such wit, a healthy start to the day over breakfast.
    Keep up the good work,
    Got cats kneading my socks, better go n feed ‘em.

    Glad to hear that idiot Mabus has been nabbed.

    Wherever you are and whatever your doing may your journey be blessed with wonder and joy.

  2. Please keep posting your wonderful opinions. But no one should have easy access to your phone # or home address. There’s really a lot of nuts out there! Dan Walls

  3. I think it is because someone pounding on Doubtful News has caused the WordPress software to ban ISPs in my neighborhood. Considering I’m in the Pacific Northwest, it is likely a Bigfoot enthusiast. Which is why I can only get to the site from elsewhere, presently I am at the library. (side note, I really like the big arrows on the side to go to the next story).

    I am so sorry you have to deal with the cranks. It was nasty grams from the Mercury Militia that caused me to leave the listserv that was about my son’s disability (where I had finally found support after being told to stop mentioning them at mom/kid group).

    Oh, that reminds me… I am also blocked from http://dontshake.org/, which coincidently is a site that certain anti-vax folks hate. Because some actually think the symptoms of shaken baby syndrome cannot be caused by shaking, but are caused by vaccines. It makes me a little ill thinking one of those may be a neighbor.

    Keep up the good work. You make sitting in a medical building waiting room much more fun (son’s cardiac rehab, I am his chauffeur).

      1. I have since learned that the server and/or software has some capability to restrict ISPs if they are pounded much by one address (I am not the only one with this issue). Or sometimes it is just random.

        You may not think you are controversial, but there are crazy people out there. It seems that you touch on some sensitive subjects (the bloop?), and it does not take much to set them off. I personally don’t think that not shaking a baby to death would be controversial, but there seem to be those who do (Buttram, Yazbak, Schreiber, most of the folks who are part of the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons).

        I am just going on by the thread of connection between your website and “dontshake.org”, but I seem to live near one who seems to think it is okay dokay to shake babies, and the damage is done by vaccines. Yes, it is an odd neighborhood, but it has its good points (like being very close to a large university).

        They are often just a little bit more sane than Markuze.
        one.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s