Monthly Archives: April 2012
In this one, I take to task some self-styled Bigfooters who consider speculation as “fact”. It gets pretty silly…
Self-styled Bigfoot researchers make claims that suggest they know more about Bigfoot than Bigfoot might know about himself. They can tell me what Bigfoot likes and doesn’t like, where he sleeps at night, how he avoids detection, and how he communicates. They tell the public that Bigfoot makes those sounds they hear at night. They find locations where a Bigfoot passed through or slept or built a shelter. These researchers even know about Bigfoots’ “culture”—what they do with their dead relatives, how they can fool humans. But apparently they don’t know enough to catch one.
Often, the credibility of witnesses will be cited as support that what the witness says is accurate or true.
That is, a law enforcement officer or pilot or military personal will be seen as more reliable than a clerk or teacher or non-professional. It’s true that observation is a learned skill. But who is well-trained at observation in stressful or low-light conditions? Everyone is pretty bad at that even when we expect it or try hard. Emotions and auto-responses take over. Our senses and our brain interpretation of the events are limited.
On Doubtful News this past week, there were two instances of “credible observation” that failed this common assumption that certain people are more reliable observers. Read the rest of this entry
New Sounds Sciencey piece. Read more about trendy new black water beverages and how they taste.
I’m going to have a bit of a rant. This post is mostly opinion. However, it is based on actual situations that can be documented.
It’s about cryptozoology forums and how they don’t work.
I’ve posted before about how I stopped visiting Cryptomundo because my comments were not posted as they were critical of the views of the original post. Or, other commentators were allowed to have free say but I was ostracized as a skeptic. Those who know me know that I am not a ranter. I try to be civil in discourse. Worse, some of my comments were edited on Cryptomundo to bias my viewpoint (an evil skeptic). See this post.
While I still don’t visit because of the ad content (ubiquitous, which makes the page unsightly and slow to load) and the content being not so great, the situation there has gotten considerably better. I feel I could post a comment there and it would now be published unchanged.
Second, I quit going to Bigfoot Evidence because misogynistic or crude remarks by some commentators (some were disgusting and personal about me [here: comment #8]) were not moderated or removed even after request (we had a small group discussion via twitter). Comments there degenerated into a cesspool at times. The content also became cheap with various “tipsters” posting unsubstantiated stories and guest posters being really off the mark. Comments were moderated for profanity but not for other sad qualities.
And, again with the ads. I get the feeling these Bigfoot sites are about profit, ego and status, not getting to the best answers about what is really going on with the Bigfoot phenomena. Read the rest of this entry