Featured in the March issue of Skeptical Inquirer

SI_March

I have two pieces in this month’s Skeptical Inquirer.

One is on my trip to the PA Bigfoot conference. The full report on that is here. But the article included on Page 5 was to counter the previous month’s article on the Russian Yeti conference.

The second article is a feature about my thesis work on amateur research and investigation groups (ARIGs) and how they are all sciencey with no substance.

This issue features cover artwork and a feature by the lovely Sara Mayhew. Check it out at your local newsstand.

Scientist states he has explanation(s) for sky noise but it only sounds sciencey

aurora

I’ve been closely following the story of strange noises from the sky that flared up in January. I wrote about them on both Doubtful News and Who Forted?

The noises are widespread, varied in type, sometimes able to be explained and sometimes known to be hoaxed. But, because this spate of anomalies (a Fortean Flap, if you will) is in the so-called apocalyptic year 2012, the phenomena has attracted the acute attention of conspiracy theorists, End Times believers, and people just concerned that something weird is happening with the planet.

Though the sky noises phenomena is fading away – the receiving frequency of these claims are lowering like the Doppler effect – reports are still trickling in.

Followers of sky sounds were excited by the news that an actual scientist who sounded like he knew what he was talking about described the causes of strange sounds.

Reposted all over the web as being from an “acclaimed”, “credentialed” and “renowned” professor, unfortunately, this article immediately raised a slew of red flags with me and others who are sensitive to what real science looks like and how not so established ideas try to dress themselves up in sciencey getups. A cursory look revealed that this piece has hallmarks of pseudoscience and creates far more confusion than clarity.

Continue reading